Context-dependent Trust Decisions with Subjective Logic

نویسندگان

  • Federico Cerutti
  • Alice Toniolo
  • Nir Oren
  • Timothy J. Norman
چکیده

A decision procedure implemented over a computational trust mechanism aims to allow for decisions to be made regarding whether some entity or information should be trusted. As recognised in the literature, trust is contextual, and we describe how such a context often translates into a confidence level which should be used to modify an underlying trust value. Jøsang’s Subjective Logic has long been used in the trust domain, and we show that its operators are insufficient to address this problem. We therefore provide a decision-making approach about trust which also considers the notion of confidence (based on context) through the introduction of a new operator. In particular, we introduce general requirements that must be respected when combining trustworthiness and confidence degree, and demonstrate the soundness of our new operator with respect to these properties.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Subjective Logic Based Trust Model for Geographic Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Original scientific paper In the past decades, several trust models have been proposed to enhance the security of Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs). The conventional trust models fail to express the notion of uncertainty during the establishment of trust relationships between mobile nodes. Furthermore, they lack in considering the context attributes in trust evaluation. This paper proposes a subj...

متن کامل

Trust Evaluation of a System for an Activity with Subjective Logic

Recently, trust emerged as a momentous aspect to evaluate resources, services or persons. In our work, the trust notion focuses on a system as a whole and from the point of view of a particular user to do a particular digital activity as editing a document, mailing, chatting, etc. Our general goals are (i) to enable users to have a personal comparison of applications allowing them to do an acti...

متن کامل

Combining Propositional Logic with Maximum Entropy Reasoning on Probability Models

We present a system for non-monotonic reasoning based on the probability calculus. This calculus incorporates this type of reasoning in two ways: Non-monotonic decisions (which can be treated as decisions under incomplete knowledge as well) can be the result of reasoning in a single probability model (via conditionalization) or in a set of probability models (via additional principles of ration...

متن کامل

Trust and cooperation from a fuzzy perspective

The well-known game of Prisoner’s Dilemma, which reflects a basic situation in which one must decide whether or not to cooperate with a competitor, is systematically solved using a fuzzy approach to modeling trust. When involved in a dispute, two or more parties need to make decisions with fully or partially conflicting objectives. In situations where reaching a more favorable outcome depends u...

متن کامل

Trust network analysis with subjective logic

Trust networks consist of transitive trust relationships between people, organisations and software agents connected through a medium for communication and interaction. By formalising trust relationships, e.g. as reputation scores or as subjective trust measures, trust between parties within the community can be derived by analysing the trust paths linking the parties together. This article des...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1309.4994  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013